Pulaski Times

U.S. Senators John Boozman, Tom Cotton, and Mike Crapo have introduced the Hearing Protection Act, a legislative proposal aimed at facilitating access to suppressors for gun owners. The bill seeks to reclassify suppressors, aligning their regulation with that of traditional firearms.

"Increasing access to hearing protection for sportsmen and hunters is common sense," said Boozman. He emphasized that responsible gun owners should not face excessive regulations when using accessories that protect their hearing.

Cotton criticized current regulations on firearm suppressors, stating they "are doing more harm than good to sportsmen and women." He noted the legislation aims to simplify access to hearing protection by removing bureaucratic hurdles.

Crapo highlighted the need to dispel misconceptions about suppressors perpetuated by Hollywood narratives. "It is past time Congress removes the burdensome barriers to accessing this equipment for the safety of Idaho’s hunters and sportsmen," he said.

The proposed act would remove suppressors from National Firearms Act regulation, streamline the transfer process through an instantaneous background check system, and increase funding for state wildlife conservation via taxation under the Pittman-Robertson Act.

Suppressors typically reduce gunshot noise by 20-35 decibels. Even the most effective models only lower sound levels to those comparable with a jackhammer.

The bill has garnered support from several senators across various states and is endorsed by organizations such as the Academy of Doctors of Audiology, National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), American Suppressor Association (ASA), Gun Owners of America (GOA), and National Rifle Association (NRA).

Amyn Amlani, Ph.D., President of the Academy of Doctors of Audiology, stated that "the Hearing Protection Act will increase access to important hearing protection for millions of Americans." Lawrence G. Keane from NSSF remarked on Hollywood's misrepresentation of suppressors' capabilities, advocating for fewer regulatory barriers.

Knox Williams from ASA criticized federal bureaucracy for complicating access to hearing protection devices. John Commerford from NRA highlighted international norms where suppressors are less regulated compared to U.S. standards.